Hi Uz, >> Maybe I'm missing the point... but the Apple2 doesn't have a >> (hardware) cursor at all - and that's the reason why there's no need >> to turn it off. But the Apple2 C library supplies a dummy function so >> the Apple2 is from neither perspective a reason not to use cursor(0) >> in some program. > > I did > > grep -w cursor *.s > > in the apple subdirectory and this showed not results, so after an additional > look into apple2.h, I assumed there's no cursor() function. You are right: There's no cursor() dummy function in the Apple2 C library. However I believe my original statement still holds true that the Apple2 doesn't keep you from using cursor(). There's a cursor() implementation in libsrc/common setting a variable to be used be cgetc(). And the Apple2 cgetc() just ignores that variable. Best, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Oct 25 14:46:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-10-25 14:46:04 CET