On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 01:25:56PM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > Maybe I'm missing the point... but the Apple2 doesn't have a > (hardware) cursor at all - and that's the reason why there's no need > to turn it off. But the Apple2 C library supplies a dummy function so > the Apple2 is from neither perspective a reason not to use cursor(0) > in some program. I did grep -w cursor *.s in the apple subdirectory and this showed not results, so after an additional look into apple2.h, I assumed there's no cursor() function. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Oct 25 12:41:56 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-10-25 12:41:58 CET