>> I forgot to mention that the executable size with cc65 is about 1/2 >> that of Aztec. > > The code I've seen from Aztec C is slightly larger than what cc65 produces, > but not that large. Maybe you're using printf and Aztec C links in the > complete floating point library? That is probably the case. When I have time I'll change the output code. >> > NQ struct N/A N/A 16 2.98 1.93 1.33 >> > NQ goto 37 55 N/A 2.93 1.54 1.32 > > What does NQ mean? N-Queens. >> > 1. The poor FP performance with Aztec C may be due to higher precision. > > I would think so. 64 bit floats is something to chew for a 6502 :-) Yep. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Tue Oct 20 16:13:39 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-10-20 16:13:41 CEST