On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 07:05:44PM -0600, Egan Ford wrote: > I forgot to mention that the executable size with cc65 is about 1/2 > that of Aztec. The code I've seen from Aztec C is slightly larger than what cc65 produces, but not that large. Maybe you're using printf and Aztec C links in the complete floating point library? > > NQ struct N/A N/A 16 2.98 1.93 1.33 > > NQ goto 37 55 N/A 2.93 1.54 1.32 What does NQ mean? > > 1. The poor FP performance with Aztec C may be due to higher precision. I would think so. 64 bit floats is something to chew for a 6502 :-) Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Oct 19 11:25:13 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-10-19 11:25:15 CEST