Re: [cc65] Benchmarks

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:35:56PM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> >From your detailed report (thanks for providing as it i.e. keeps me
> from investing time into Aztec C in vain myself) I understand that it
> is hard to find a reasonable competitor - which makes indeed the whole
> effort somewhat pointless...

I wouldn't say it that way.

The Apple version of Aztec C is version 3.2 instead of 1.05. See also the post
from Egan Ford regarding benchmarks - it does also list 3.2 as version number
for the Aztec compiler. I do assume that this compiler does at least support
"void" and "unsigned long". It may also have some more standard functions.

In addition, a Windows user won't have to use dosbox and does eventually have
an editor that terminates files with Ctrl-Z, so several of the problems are
gone.

A Windows user compiling for the Apple might have more success than I had
using Linux and compiling for the C64.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.