Hi! On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 06:49:43PM -0700, Ted Larson wrote: > Thanks for the reply. I recognize the situation with them is tricky. This > is one of the reasons I was thinking about re-working the compiler portion > to emit assembly that can be assembled, and linked using their assembler and > linker. This essentially gets around the problem, because it is not a > binary, and doesn't require really any proprietary knowledge to create. That is correct, but it requires you not only to change the compiler, but also most if not all source modules of the runtime and C library. Which is a change that cannot be reintegrated, so you have to maintain the resulting sources on your own. I'm not sure if this is really a viable solution. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Sep 28 19:04:26 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-28 19:04:27 CEST