Re: [cc65] c64 kernal 02 vs. 03

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2009-09-27 20:51:19
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 08:36:55PM +0200, Thomas Giesel wrote:
> This was also my first idea. But I had some doubts, because it's not an
> official kernal entry. There's a small chance that there are kernal
> derivates out there which don't have this function at this place. But on
> the other hand this is the solution with the smallest footprint.

The code difference is negligible, but the advantage is that PLOT is an
external symbol, which means that in other places, where PLOT is called, this
will now also call the fixed version.

> So in my opinion this should be the right solution, at least until
> somebody complains that it doesn't work with a certain kernal.

I've fixed that in SVN, could you give it a try? 

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sun Sep 27 20:54:00 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-27 20:54:02 CEST