Re: [cc65] Optimizer bug found

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2009-09-11 22:21:03
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:14:31PM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> In case "C128 banking" means more RAM for straight cc65 programs then
> that would indeed be great - and basically a prerequisite for a C128
> (-> 80 column) Contiki web browser (or the new optimizer generates way
> smaller code :-))

I would like to run C128 programs without the kernal in place, similar to the
Plus/4. This means ~15K more RAM. But all this depends on being able to run
without the I/O area in place, so I will have to check if it is possible. Not
only kernal routines, but anything that does I/O will have to be changed.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Sep 11 22:23:56 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-11 22:23:57 CEST