Re: [cc65] Optimizer bug found

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <>
Date: 2009-09-11 22:21:03
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:14:31PM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> In case "C128 banking" means more RAM for straight cc65 programs then
> that would indeed be great - and basically a prerequisite for a C128
> (-> 80 column) Contiki web browser (or the new optimizer generates way
> smaller code :-))

I would like to run C128 programs without the kernal in place, similar to the
Plus/4. This means ~15K more RAM. But all this depends on being able to run
without the I/O area in place, so I will have to check if it is possible. Not
only kernal routines, but anything that does I/O will have to be changed.



Ullrich von Bassewitz                        
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Sep 11 22:23:56 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-11 22:23:57 CEST