Re: [cc65] Re: New 80 col switch API

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <>
Date: 2009-09-08 15:56:37
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:39:59PM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> ... where it will be (most likely)
> #define VIDEOMODE_40COL         0x11
> #define VIDEOMODE_80COL         0x12

Do you think, we can make argument and return code an unsigned, and change the
#define names to VIDEOMODE_80x25 and VIDEOMODE_40x25 respectively? This would
give more comfortable upgrade path if required later, while there are no real
disadvantages now. I would then just ignore the high byte of the passed
argument in the C128 routine. The result is already returned in a/x so at
least for the C128, there wouldn't be any code changes.



Ullrich von Bassewitz                        
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Tue Sep 8 15:58:45 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-08 15:58:47 CEST