Re: [cc65] two little bugs

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <>
Date: 2009-08-20 20:50:56

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:23:48PM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> V2.12.9:
> Error: Call to undefined function `...'
> Maybe I missed some discussion/post/... here so I need to ask if this
> change in behaviour is intended.

Yes it's intended. The comment in the source says:

    /* C99 doesn't allow calls to undefined functions, so
     * generate an error and otherwise a warning. ...

I've had a look into the standard, but all I could find in the hurry was

    - remove implicit function declaration

in the list of differences to C89 in the foreword. I will recheck this and
revert the change if necessary.

If you have old sources, you may use "--standard c89" to accept things like
mussing function declarations. The disadvantage is that this will also disable
C99 and cc65 extensions.



Ullrich von Bassewitz                        
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Thu Aug 20 20:53:34 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-08-20 20:53:36 CEST