Re: [cc65] indirect load question...

From: Markus Stehr <bastetfurry1ircnet.de>
Date: 2009-03-04 12:53:40
Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 07:31 +0100 schrieb Spiro Trikaliotis:
> > #include <peekpoke.h>
> > #define MOUSE_PTR 0x0284
> > unsigned char a=PEEK(MOUSE_PTR);
> 
> Indeed, this seems to be the most efficient way to do it. Sad, isn't it?

I always see the 65xx as an embedded platform when writing in C, so this
would be perfectly ok if codesize and execution time matters.
But thats just MHO. ;)

greetings,
Markus


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Wed Mar 4 12:53:50 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-03-04 12:53:52 CET