Re: [cc65] Global zero page pointers

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2007-07-02 09:49:39
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:57:41PM -0700, Dan wrote:
> "the standard"? I'm just asking if any of the peephole
> optimizer routines implicitly assume and rely on a
> zero page variable always being an 'auto'. With this
> change they can be either autos or globals.

Sorry - as I wrote I didn't understand the question.

No, I don't know of any optimization assuming that a zero page variable is
always on the stack.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Mon Jul 2 09:49:47 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-07-02 09:49:50 CEST