--- Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz@musoftware.de> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 06:06:32PM -0700, Dan wrote: > > Ullrich, can you confirm this is safe? It would > only > > be a problem if stores to regbank without > subsequent > > loads were optimized away. But as far as I can > tell, > > there is no such optimization. > > I don't really understand, what you mean with > "safe", but if in doubt, I > wouldn't rely on the existing implementation. If the > standard doesn't say that > something is safe, chances are, that the > implementation will change. "the standard"? I'm just asking if any of the peephole optimizer routines implicitly assume and rely on a zero page variable always being an 'auto'. With this change they can be either autos or globals. Dan ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Jul 2 05:57:51 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2007-07-02 05:57:55 CEST