Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: >On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:34:54AM +0200, Groepaz wrote: > > >>yes ofcourse, but every small bit counts imho.... 1% in some innerloop can be >>a LOT :=) >> >> > >But I assume that using undocumented opcodes would be even less than this. >What about 0.25%? Would this be worth the trouble? > > Please, no undocumented opcodes or self modifying code. Even modifying a return address on the stack confuses me. Most developers debug this on emulators that know nothing about undocumented hardware "features". -- Karri ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Apr 6 10:03:07 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-04-06 10:03:10 CEST