Re: [cc65] C Compiler Semantic Analysis

From: MagerValp <MagerValp1cling.gu.se>
Date: 2006-01-17 00:24:17
>>>>> "G" == Groepaz  <groepaz@gmx.net> writes:

G> urks, what a horrible thought :=D

Hey now ;)

G> it could however be very useful to transform old basic programs
G> into portable C and then work from there.... not quite an easy task
G> though, basic (v2) allows for some horrible spaghetti constructs

Well, yes, I was thinking of modern, structured BASIC - not old 8-bit
BASIC with linenumbers. That doesn't translate cleanly into C, and
there's not much in CC65 (apart from the assembler and linker) that
you could use.

-- 
    ___          .     .  .         .       . +  .         .      o   
  _|___|_   +   .  +     .     +         .  Per Olofsson, arkadspelare
    o-o    .      .     .   o         +          MagerValp@cling.gu.se
     -       +            +    .     http://www.cling.gu.se/~cl3polof/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Tue Jan 17 00:24:29 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-01-17 00:24:31 CET