On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:17:30PM +0100, Groepaz wrote: > ok i'll have a look at it.... :) did you compile it with the latest snapshot > btw? what framerate did you get? :) I didn't compile it, just used the precompiled binary, and then looked through the code. If I compile it with the current version I get no change in the framerate (18.4). Looking at the compiled code, I would say, it's difficult to improve, since most time critical stuff is almost optimal by the use of inline macros. Anyway, more than 18 frames is really impressing. How much time did you spend looking at the resulting code to improve it? :-) Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Nov 30 21:34:46 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-11-30 21:34:49 CET