Re: [cc65] Changes between 2.10.1 and current 2.10.5?

Good morning!

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 07:47:45AM -0700, Andy Dannelley wrote:
> I don't know if you will get two copies of this or just one, I just got
> your email about messages deleted with too much quoted material, so,
> just to be on the safe side I thought I would delete more quoted
> material and re-send the message.

It's easy: If you get a copy of your own mail from the list manager, then it
has been distributed to the list. If you don't get a copy, there has been a
problem.

> What I am curious about, is, is there something different about the way
> 2.10.5 finds or where it expects the include files to be that is
> different from 2.10.1?  If there is a difference, maybe I can modify
> what I am doing to take it into account.

If CC65_INC is #define'd when compiling cc65, the value of this symbol is used
as builtin search path for includes. If it is not #define'd,
/usr/lib/cc65/include is used instead. Depending on your system, the latter
may not work. The path should of course match the location of the include
files on your system. This #define has also been in 2.10.1, but if the
executable has been compiled by different people, the builtin paths may
differ.

If you have compiled the snapshot version yourself, and if you're comparing
that against a precompiled 2.10.1, it may be possible that the guy who
compiled 2.10.1 set the builtin search path to some other value than you did.

You can change the setting in the makefile, or by using

        make CC65_INC=/my/special/search/path -f make/gcc.mak

in the compiler subdirectory.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.