Re: [cc65] Changes between 2.10.1 and current 2.10.5?

From: Andy Dannelley <andyda1mac.com>
Date: 2005-06-02 17:32:05
Hi (again)

Rats!  That's what I get for writing a response before my first cup of 
coffee, not yet awake.

It is not the linker (ld65) which has the problem locating the include 
files, it is the compiler (cc65) that complains about the missing 
include files.

  The rest of the previous message is OK, just the confusion over linker 
vs compiler not finding the include files.

BTW:  using Mac OS X 10.3.7

Sorry about the confusion, I need to get that coffee now and get more 
awake. ;)

Thanks again,

Andy


On Jun 2, 2005, at 7:47 AM, Andy Dannelley wrote:

>
> My questions ---
>
> When I install the 2.10.1 version and then assemble  using ca65 and 
> link using ld65 the linker will locate the include files just fine 
> with no additional intervention from me.
>
> When I install the 2.10.5 (20053005) version using the same method as 
> I used for 2.10.1, I find that ld65 doesn't locate the include files, 
> and I must use the -I PATH option to inform the linker where the 
> include files are located.
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Thu Jun 2 17:32:12 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-06-02 17:32:14 CEST