Hello, * On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:29:52AM +0100 Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > Actually, 3.0 has been on the horizon for quite some time now:-) I'm > waiting for myself to make some final changes to the preprocessor, but > it seems I'm too lazy. Seriously: There's not much left, and once I > hit the road it should be done in a weekend or so. There are also > contributions, which are not quite finished. In this case, it might be worth to mention some things: On your bugs page, I cannot find the following things mentioned: - co65 generating exports NAME = XXX, instead of NAME = $1234 with o65 files - ca65 does not accept unary plus Furthermore, I have a problem generating o65 files. Regardless if I have FORMATS { o65: os = cc65 [...]; } or os = OSA65, or os = Lunix, it seems the output file is always of type Lunix (the optional OS header has the bytes $04, $01, $02, $00). Furthermore, I'm not quite sure if I can use another os for this (os = 4 comes to mind) or not - I do not get any error if I put arbitrary integers there, but I do not see any effect, either. Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://www.trikaliotis.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Mar 30 19:00:23 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-03-30 19:00:29 CEST