On Thursday 21 October 2004 23:29, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > So what is your proposed solution? cc65 uses linuxdoc, and I'm not sure if > linuxdoc works with a newer version of sgmltools. Besides that, there are no > ready to run RPM packages for the new version (or am I wrong?). no you are right. mmmmh i guess making the toplevel makefile so cc65 can be compiled without building the docs is the best solution atm :/ > > 2) the makefile for the sample-programs relies on the sourcetree... ie > > The makefile relies on the sourcetree, because I like to build the samples > with the compiler that came with exactly these samples, and not with the one, > that happens to lie around in /usr/bin. I know that this could be argued, > there's also a valid reason for using the compiler from /usr/bin. But just > changing the paths from one to the other is no real solution. Either we can > have both possibilities, or we need two makefiles:-) what about an if/else construct then and a INSOURCETREE=1/0 variable at the top? two makefiles sound like overkill to me :=P gpz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Oct 22 11:44:11 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-10-22 11:44:20 CEST