Re: [cc65] makefile problems

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2004-10-21 23:29:09
Sorry for the delay, I've been away since sunday.

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 06:46:37AM +0200, Groepaz wrote:
> 1) the build-process of the documentation relies on a rather obsolete version of sgmltools
> (i would assume v2, or some linuxdoc variant). the problem is that the currently activly
> developed version (v3, http://sgmltools-lite.sourceforge.net) doesnt understand some of
> the commandline options used in the cc65 makefiles.

So what is your proposed solution? cc65 uses linuxdoc, and I'm not sure if
linuxdoc works with a newer version of sgmltools. Besides that, there are no
ready to run RPM packages for the new version (or am I wrong?).

> 2) the makefile for the sample-programs relies on the sourcetree... ie

The makefile relies on the sourcetree, because I like to build the samples
with the compiler that came with exactly these samples, and not with the one,
that happens to lie around in /usr/bin. I know that this could be argued,
there's also a valid reason for using the compiler from /usr/bin. But just
changing the paths from one to the other is no real solution. Either we can
have both possibilities, or we need two makefiles:-)

> it would also be nice if the toplevel makefile had seperate targets for building and installing
> the executables/libraries/documentation and sample programs. (i can supply that too).

Greg has taken over the top level makefile. Greg, are you listening?

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Thu Oct 21 23:29:14 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-10-21 23:29:23 CEST