Hi, > I'm trying to avoid a proliferation of targets - that's a difference:-) If > there is a good reason to add another target, it can be done. But I certainly > don't want to have 13 Apple targets, each supporting random mixes of hardware > and disk i/o. My understanding was that the linker could be possibly enhanced to allow for several altenative file i/o libraries "inside" one target. Probably one could oragnize the source files (directories etc) and make now in a way that it could make use of such a linker later ? Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat Jul 31 16:43:24 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-07-31 16:44:09 CEST