On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 02:06:40PM -0700, Shawn Jefferson wrote: > Still, the guy does have a point about adding a small > blurb to the header of those files that do contain JR > Dunning's code. It would make things more clear. Yes, that suggestion is ok. It doesn't change much, but it makes it easier for people to find about the file status. However, identifying exact code sequences is rather difficult, because (as you have probably read) nothing looks as in the JRD version, and many small pieces of old code are mixed with larger pieces of new code. As part of the latest changes, more code has been rewritten and moved out of the files in question, so hopefully the problem will vanish some time in the future. > Wouldn't it be nice to live in a world without lawyers > where everyone just asked you if they could use your > work first? I'm not sure if I do really want such a world, but as a dream, it's probably ok:-) Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Jun 25 23:27:31 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-06-25 23:27:39 CEST