On Thursday 10 June 2004 08:36, Adam Dunkels wrote: > > ? i've seen the first variant a couple of times now, but always used > > the second one without problems ... so is there a reason to prefer the > > first? (can you show an example where the second wouldnt work?) > > if(something()) > disable_irq(n); > else > enable_irq(n); > > This will give a syntax error because of the };else sequence. aaaaahhhhhhhh ok :) must be my personal habit of always using curly braces even if they arent really necessary (imho thats good programming style, since it prevents errors when such a statement is extended). now i'm wondering why noone i worked with ever complained about it :=P gpz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Jun 10 21:59:42 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-06-10 21:59:50 CEST