Re: [cc65] Compiling Code to load at $C000

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-12-31 18:38:02 

On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:21:40AM -0800, Payton Byrd wrote:
> This makes sense.  What if I was targeting a C= 128?
> Would it be possible to leave all of the basic RAM
> allocated as normal to Bank 0 and have all of my C
> targeted to Bank 1?

If the BASIC interpreter/program doesn't use bank 1, this is possible.
But you're on your own in regard to all the banking stuff.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-12-31 18:38:12 CET