From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2003-12-31 18:40:48
On Wednesday 31 December 2003 18:21, Payton Byrd wrote: > This makes sense. What if I was targeting a C= 128? > Would it be possible to leave all of the basic RAM > allocated as normal to Bank 0 and have all of my C > targeted to Bank 1? Wouldn't that solve the tight > memory problems? I haven't reached a point of no > return yet on my design and would actually prefer to > target the C= 128. mmmmh.... no idea about the banking (i think atleast the plus4 and the cbm610 or cbm510 targets have support for that though) i suspect its easy enough to make the startup-code switch banks or sth though (if what you want is running code in just one bank and leave the other alone). > What would be nice is if someone with that already has > the knowledge of how to do this kind of stuff would > write a Howto about it so that those of us who are new > to C and especially C on C= platforms could hit the > ground running. Maybe such documentation already > exists??? there is very little documentation about using c on 8bit targets in general.... since only few ppl are insane enough to actually use C on 8bit targets i guess :=P gpz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-12-31 18:34:07 CET