From: Todd Elliott (eyeth_at_videocam.net.au)
Date: 2003-10-29 15:18:03
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 04:17:30PM +1030, Todd Elliott wrote: > > Most indirect Y addressing mode instructions were disassembled properly, > > but quite a few were disassembled as indirect X addressing mode > > instructions. > Can you give me an example? > Hello. It seems that the actual cmp ($00),y instruction is disassembled as a cmp ($00,x) instruction. However, some cmp ($00),y instructions were disassembled properly. The $00 in the example refers to any number. Secondly, is there a good freeware file compare utility for Windows or LINUX? I'm using HexCmp 2.0.0.3, a windows utility, but it is shareware/commercial. This is how I was able to catch most errors generated by DA65, by comparing the compiled disassembly against the original binary. Enjoy. -- Todd Elliott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-10-29 15:21:21 CET