From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-10-11 13:43:03
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:25:18PM +0200, Maciej Witkowiak wrote:
> I don't know what is better when thinking about all supported targets - should
> da65 understand .cvt format or should grc/[new tool] be able to split files
> into something that da65 understands now - CBM DOS PRG-like files.
I don't like the idea of adding special support for the GEOS .cvt format to
da65. Perferable either da65 or a new tool should be able to split arbitrary
files into pieces depending on information read from a config file, and from
the binary itself. Because of the complexity of the possible file formats,
this will probably need scripting. I will have to look into this.
[symbols]
> They could be provided with da65 or GEOS package in some additional file so
> a user doesn't have to prepare it himself. Is it ok?
Keith Gerdes has suggested addition of a special include directive in the info
file, that reads files with definitions in ca65 syntax. While this breaks the
info file syntax somehow, it is an appealing idea, because the disassembler
could use the same files as the assembler (provided they're crafted with some
care).
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-10-11 13:43:35 CEST