Re: [cc65] Optimizing C code

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-09-09 11:26:23 

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:20:02AM +0200, MagerValp wrote:
> UvB> With the latter number (641 plots per second), this means that
> UvB> 20% of the overall time is overhead, probably most of it moving
> UvB> the parameters to the stack and back. If you're going to do some
> UvB> further optimization, you may want to have a look at the call,
> UvB> too.
>
> Is there a reason why you're not writing this routine in assembler? It
> would benefit a lot from it...

I'm not the one writing the routine, I'm just giving help with writing C code.
You will have to ask Shawn.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-09-09 11:26:30 CEST