Re: [cc65] Optimizing C code

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: MagerValp (MagerValp_at_cling.gu.se)
Date: 2003-09-09 11:20:02 

>>>>> "UvB" == Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz_at_musoftware.de> writes:

UvB> With the latter number (641 plots per second), this means that
UvB> 20% of the overall time is overhead, probably most of it moving
UvB> the parameters to the stack and back. If you're going to do some
UvB> further optimization, you may want to have a look at the call,
UvB> too.

Is there a reason why you're not writing this routine in assembler? It
would benefit a lot from it...

-- 
                       Wildstar delenda est
    ___          .     .  .         .       . +  .         .      o   
  _|___|_   +   .  +     .     +         .  Per Olofsson, arkadspelare
    o-o    .      .     .   o         +          MagerValp_at_cling.gu.se
     -       +            +    .     http://www.cling.gu.se/~cl3polof/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-09-09 11:24:29 CEST