From: Maciej Witkowiak (ytm_at_elysium.pl)
Date: 2003-08-11 23:26:48
Ullrich von Bassewitz dnia 11 sie 2003 o 21:59 +0200 napisał:
> 3. [This is only loosely related to your idea] I don't have access to
> anything Lunix related but the linker config, so I do not even know how
> the startup code must be changed to support a new configuration. Wouldn't
> it be a good idea to make at least the Lunix startup code part of cc65?
> Otherwise it doesn't make much sense to have a builtin Lunix linker
> config, since both must always match, or programs will not work
> correctly.
Groepaz wrote cc65 side of Lunix support. Maybe he will write something more,
Anyway, LNG linker config uses $1000 instead of %S (just to virtualize the
address) and startup code does, well, almost nothing. Currently the stuff is
there in LNG CVS at Sourceforge (available through www interface, too).
Considering that it has big chunks of cc65 libs and runtime code and that
whole LNG is under GNU GPL[1] I think that it should be moved to cc65, under
its terms. And that it is Groepaz who can make such decision (I can do the
rest).
ytm
[1] I hate to bring such issues but someone would point them out anyway
sooner or later
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-08-12 00:17:44 CEST