Re: [cc65] memory corruption?

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2003-06-03 14:29:57 

On Tuesday 03 June 2003 13:03, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:47:22PM +0200, MagerValp wrote:
> > Finally managed to track it down, and it was just a free() call too
> > many. This did the trick:
>
> [...]
>
> The original malloc/free implementation was targeted for a 32 bit CPU and
> had several safety checks builtin. These checks have been removed because
> of performance/space considerations. Maybe it would be an idea to supply a
> second malloc implementation for debug purposes...

mmmh wasnt there some free (non gpl) allocator available along the lines of 
newlib? mmmmmmh :O) i remember i've used that kinda thing for debugging some 
time ago :=P

gpz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-06-03 14:32:08 CEST