Re: [cc65] memory corruption?

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-06-03 13:03:35 

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:47:22PM +0200, MagerValp wrote:
> Finally managed to track it down, and it was just a free() call too
> many. This did the trick:
[...]

The original malloc/free implementation was targeted for a 32 bit CPU and
had several safety checks builtin. These checks have been removed because
of performance/space considerations. Maybe it would be an idea to supply a
second malloc implementation for debug purposes... 

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-06-03 13:03:44 CEST