RE: [cc65] Machines with switchable clock

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Piotr Fusik (P.Fusik_at_elka.pw.edu.pl)
Date: 2003-02-20 16:44:47 

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Steve Nicklin wrote:

> Getting a bit off subject a bit but I read somewhere though that an NTSC
> machine is ~effectively~ slower than a PAL machine because it spends more
> time accessing the CPU for graphics routines per second.

That's right.

> I think it said that the PAL machine is effectively 2.2 something mHz
> (although not in reality).

Effectively it's 1.6 or less, NTSC is even less, but still more than C64.
:-)

Piotr

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-02-20 16:45:29 CET