From: Tim Schürmann (tischuer_at_web.de)
Date: 2003-01-23 17:36:23
Hi Spiro,
Spiro Trikaliotis schrieb:
> > What you got there is, that TestStruct points to a beginning of the
> > allocated memory of 1 TestStruct (why do you "malloc" the TestStruct?
> > TestStruct already exist)
>
> well, the type TestStruct exists, but there isn't memory for it.
No, because:
struct noname {
...
};
struct noname TestStruct;
and
struct {
...
} TestStruct;
defines both a variable TestStruct. It is not nessesary to allocate memory (only
for the *data array - see also the original mail from Christian Krüger).
Bye,
Tim Schürmann
tischuer_at_web.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-01-23 17:37:47 CET