From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2002-11-28 16:12:53
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 07:58:53AM -0500, Greg King wrote:
> I was thinking of the variables that are used by the subroutines in LOWCODE. It
> is easier -- and runs faster -- to put their "personal" data with them in that
> safe space than it is to make those routines be able to handle whatever kind of
> memory-banking that they might encounter (in order to find their [possibly
> hidden] data elsewhere).
Yes, I know. However, only a few platforms need LOWCODE (the ones with banked
memory support, which is currently only the Plus/4). And from these, currently
none needs LOWDATA. So I just want to defer the decision until it's really
needed.
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-11-28 16:13:03 CET