RE: [cc65] Inserting Assembly Routines

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Keates, Mark (Mark.Keates_at_dendrite.com)
Date: 2002-11-26 11:40:19


Hi,

> ca65 is not only an assembler, it is in fact one of the best assemblers
> around:-) [*]

> [*] I had to write this, since I'm the author:-) But it's not only me who
> thinks that. You may for example read

Many of the developers on AtariAge
(http://www.atariage.com/forums/index.php)
seem to prefer XASM or TASM, probably because the CC65 suite is not
out-of-the-box
ready for the Atari consoles. I've not tried these myself to make a fair
comparison
but from what I see in their source listings they are close to MAC/65 which
was
a favourite of A8 developers.

For me, CA65 is the choice as I prefer the modular approach to developing,
i.e. .s or .c to .o and then link, with makefiles controling the building
of that which has changed. But the best advantage for me is that you don't 
really have to worry about where your variables get stored, it all comes 
out in the wash (so to speak)!

Regards,

Mark
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.


Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-11-26 11:40:41 CET