From: Keates, Mark (Mark.Keates_at_dendrite.com)
Date: 2002-11-26 11:40:19
Hi, > ca65 is not only an assembler, it is in fact one of the best assemblers > around:-) [*] > [*] I had to write this, since I'm the author:-) But it's not only me who > thinks that. You may for example read Many of the developers on AtariAge (http://www.atariage.com/forums/index.php) seem to prefer XASM or TASM, probably because the CC65 suite is not out-of-the-box ready for the Atari consoles. I've not tried these myself to make a fair comparison but from what I see in their source listings they are close to MAC/65 which was a favourite of A8 developers. For me, CA65 is the choice as I prefer the modular approach to developing, i.e. .s or .c to .o and then link, with makefiles controling the building of that which has changed. But the best advantage for me is that you don't really have to worry about where your variables get stored, it all comes out in the wash (so to speak)! Regards, Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-11-26 11:40:41 CET