From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2002-11-19 14:47:20
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 03:10:21AM +0100, groepaz wrote:
> 3) all existing fastloaders, except jiffy-dos (not very common in
> europe) and speed-dos (even less common even in europe ;=P) do speed
> up kernal SAVE and LOAD... ONLY! ie, any library that tries to imitate
> stdio, and thus uses sequential file access will NOT be speeded up
> here!
Ok, that's an argument. Fortunately, I've aquired a bunch of used CMD
equipment including Jiffy DOS a few years ago, so it does not hold for me:-)
As said before: Everyone does now have a choice. If you prefer the CBM
routines, go ahead and use them. At least I don't have to tell people to use
the CBM file i/o functions, because C file i/o is available.
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-11-19 14:47:25 CET