From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2002-05-22 10:45:44
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:27:56AM +0200, Piotr Fusik wrote: > IMHO best would be to have IEEE 4-byte floats. Since doubles are very > common (probably more than floats) I would suggest built-in typedef float > double. What does the C standard say about it? On many platforms int == > long, is it ok if float == double ? float == double is ok. The standard says (similar as with integers) that the precision of double must be larger or equal than that of floats. There exist some (standard compliant) C compilers, that have just one floating point type. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-05-22 10:45:45 CEST