From: Stephan Lesch (slesch_at_studcs.uni-sb.de)
Date: 2002-05-17 21:23:38
Hi Groepaz, > it depends on the actual size of your program.... the larger your > program will be, the less "overhead" (in terms of size) you will have. I guess with "overhead" you mean the library it's linked against? That's clear, but I was wondering how much larger the compiled C code would be if you don't count the libraries. Uz says a factor of 1.5 would be an efficient result, so I'll assume a factor between 1.5 and 2. > you can recompile - my suggestion for that would be, use a > musicroutine and an irq-loader that you have sources of and convert > those to ca65 syntax....this way they will integrate into the rest of > your project nicely. That might be a problem, at least for the music routines. But I was hoping I could work around that, by putting the music to $1000, and changing the linker config and startup code so the program starts at e.g. $2800. Of course it's less elegant, but do you see a general problem? Greets, Stephan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-05-17 21:23:39 CEST