From: groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2002-02-15 12:08:24
Hello Ullrich, Friday, February 15, 2002, 11:41:48 AM, you wrote: UvB> Hi! UvB> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:12:52AM +0100, groepaz wrote: >> whatever, couldnt you just introduce a #pragma or sth for the compiler >> so anyone can handle that crap like he wants themselves? UvB> This is a good idea! Having a #pragma does not break anything, allows for UvB> other things (like custom character maps, character maps for currently UvB> unsupported platforms and so on), and allows to evaluate new mappings without UvB> any changes in the compiler. UvB> [x] Added to my TODO list(*) :=) btw, it maybe a good idea to allow the pragma to occur several times in the same source.... (one could think about creating a bunch of headerfiles of which one maps the charset to petscii (lowercase), one to petscii (uppercase) one to screencode etc pp) UvB> (*) Regarding your request for macro names in the assembler starting with a UvB> dot (which was also in my TODO list): This is done and will be part of UvB> the next release. wohooo very cool.... (since this would also allow to create "clean looking" .petscii, .screen etc macros!) maybe creating such a "charset-remapping" functionality for the assembler itself wouldnt hurt either (its not quite trivial to create a macro that accepts arguments like the .byte pseudoop does for eg, would be much more easier to handle that way then) -- Best regards, groepaz mailto:groepaz_at_gmx.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-02-15 12:08:54 CET