From: groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2002-02-12 21:39:12
Hello Ullrich, Tuesday, February 12, 2002, 7:34:55 PM, you wrote: UvB> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 04:47:43PM +0100, groepaz wrote: >> mmmmh, dunno about that (nor do i really care :=P) but i took that >> testsuite from some lcc-distribution .zip (jolze's 65816 port >> actually) so i guess its under gpl aswell..... UvB> Large parts of the authors web pages are currently unaccessible, but as far as UvB> I remember lcc is not GPLed. yeah right, just looked..... lcc itself comes with "Addison Wesley licence" ..... as far as i can tell the only potential problem with that could be, that someone wouldnt be allowed to take a substantial part of the testsuite and use it as a substantial part of another, _commercial_ product. (this would require an agreement from Addison Wesley) ... however, the licence explicitly mentions lcc itself, its not quite clear to me if it applies to the testsuite aswell (which doesnt bring its own licence) - especially since i have seen parts of the testsuite elsewhere (not in commercial products though).... also some of the testsuite's programs have their own copyright stuff in them....and others are very trivial programs, i could always claim to have written them myself hehe ;=D however, its still easy to remove/replace any offending code from the testsuite if we ever feel like it..... there should be plenty of testcode out there that isnt restricted. >> however, since the testsuite is probably not interisting for most ppl >> anyway (except taking its programs as examples for own work) it >> shouldnt hurt to distribute it seperatly anyway. UvB> It would be nice to make it part of the source package, so people working with UvB> the compiler would be able to run the test suite. yeah sure.... just ment that it wouldnt hurt to keep them in seperated packages for example. (few ppl would actually care to run the tests i guess and so would prefer a smaller download) .... it would probably be closely related to the source-distribution though, right. >> however, actually another project of mine is a retargetable debugger, UvB> [..] [...] UvB> Operating system was Windows NT 4.0 (english version). ooohhhh yesyesyes now you say it, i remember that particular problem.... its fixed in my current version actually.... if you like i can mail you my current exe and ini...... i have never tried this on win-nt/2000 though, so theres still a small chance that it wont work there (i wouldnt expect those quirks you mentioned though :o)) >> mmmh since my knowledge in programming any network stuff is less than >> zero, some other guy gotta implement this :=P UvB> TCP sockets are rather easy to do and they are more portable than named pipes UvB> and similar stuff. hehe well :o) i have no experience with any of these and "simelar stuff" either - interaction with a program means "command line" to me and nothing else :=) >> now my question is, WHAT embedded hardware is that with a 6502 inside? UvB> It depends. But I know definitely, that several people are using cc65 together UvB> with embedded or home made hardware, some of them are actually on this list:-) so you "some of them" ... let us (me hehe) know :o) -- Best regards, groepaz mailto:groepaz_at_gmx.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-02-12 21:39:30 CET