Re[4]: [cc65] Compile problem

Date view	Thread view	Subject view

From: groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2001-12-12 18:15:43

Next message: Ullrich von Bassewitz: "Re: [cc65] Compile problem"
Previous message: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: Re[2]: [cc65] Compile problem"
In reply to: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: Re[2]: [cc65] Compile problem"
Next in thread: Spiro Trikaliotis: "OT: WIN and paths (was: [cc65] Compile problem)"
Reply: Spiro Trikaliotis: "OT: WIN and paths (was: [cc65] Compile problem)"

Hello Marko,

Wednesday, December 12, 2001, 6:08:13 PM, you wrote:

MM> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, groepaz wrote:

>> sounds odd to me ;=D unix fails to do something right that ms-dos can
>> do perfectly fine ??? => shame :o)

MM> Am I mistaken, or does MS-DOS (and Windows 3, possibly also Windows 95
MM> and 98) have a global "current working directory" for all processes?  When
MM> one process changes the directory, it is changed for all processes.  I'd
MM> call that inferior design.

yes thats true ;o) probably still the same in win-XP ,=)

-- 
Best regards,
 groepaz                            mailto:groepaz_at_gmx.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Next message: Ullrich von Bassewitz: "Re: [cc65] Compile problem"
Previous message: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: Re[2]: [cc65] Compile problem"
In reply to: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: Re[2]: [cc65] Compile problem"
Next in thread: Spiro Trikaliotis: "OT: WIN and paths (was: [cc65] Compile problem)"
Reply: Spiro Trikaliotis: "OT: WIN and paths (was: [cc65] Compile problem)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2001-12-14 22:05:44 CET