Re: [cc65] C64 web server

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Spiro Trikaliotis (Trik-news_at_gmx.de)
Date: 2001-10-17 16:15:25


Hello René,


"René de Bie" <Rene_at_the-underground.myweb.nl> wrote:

> > That's exactly the difference between the CBM floppies and
> > other floppies
[...]

> Hi I don't agree, because the Atari 8-bit drives have also there own 650x
> processor with RAM and ROM. When you have a speedy or Happy upgrade
(floppy

Thanks your this clarification, I did not know this! I always thought Atari
drives were as dumb as Apple drives (which are just the drive itself,
nothing more).

> The Atari drives have no DOS, and this had brought us some nice DOS
programs
> like SpartaDOS (msdos like) with an other way of reading/writing disks
then

Hm... MS-DOS like? Well... But MS-DOS (despite of its name) is *not* a DOS
in the sense I would see it in this context. The DOS 2.6 of the 1541 for
example is a firmware that runs the floppy (*only* the floppy part). It's
quite limited and does not offer very much entry points like a "real" OS
should do. MS-DOS, on the other side, is a "full-featured" OS *LOL* (like
the CBM's Kernel, for example) which did not even need to have a disk drive
(at least the MS-DOS 1.xx versions worked even with the tape drive of the
IBM PC).

BTW, do you know that COMMAND.COM (the DOS shell) is just *one* possible
type of shell? I think with MS-DOS style you meant the shell which I would
not see as part of the core OS. In fact, if you tell me that SpartaDOS is
MS-DOS like, I would think about something having similar interfaces for
programs as MS-DOS has - and I doubt that SpartaDOS did this, did it?


Spiro.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.


Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2001-12-14 22:05:43 CET