On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 12:09:52PM +0100, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote: > :-) If the reason is important, I am not that much interested in "better" > answer, because chances to remove this limitation and allow names like e.g. > "1541RAM0200" are slim anyway, aren't they? ;-) It simplifies the scanner, because a token can be easily identified. Depending on the direction in which the linker develops there might also be ambiguities in the future. Such "names" do for example forbid the use of C style hex numbers ("0x000"). At least as long as the language used in the config file is not context sensitive. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat Mar 2 12:19:55 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2013-03-02 12:19:59 CET