Re: [cc65] Banking out Kernal

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2013-02-17 13:12:15
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 01:58:03PM +0100, Stefan wrote:
> I would prefer a header file with two forward declarations
>
> void switch_rom_off (void) and
> void switch_rom_on (void) (or even macros)
>
> so that the programmer can decide by himself when to switch the memory
> configuration.

That's possible but completely different from what Oliver proposed. Since the
linker doesn't know about above routines, no additional space for code or
static data is gained and it is up to the program to manage that space at
runtime.                        

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sun Feb 17 13:12:22 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2013-02-17 13:12:26 CET