Hi, > Using a packer for the program as already suggested is probably a better idea. Or from a slightly different perspective: Totally independent from the way the unpacking is actually implemented/integrated the unpacker has its fixed size. So it is desirable to pack as many stuff as possible in order to out weight that overhead. Therefore the unpacker should run first and unpack everything else. And exactly that behavior is already available as cc65-external tool(s). Regards, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Jan 9 10:17:22 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2013-01-09 10:17:25 CET