Re: [cc65] tgi_sprite and friends

From: Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc1web.de>
Date: 2012-11-09 11:07:51
Hi,

> I prefer tgi_blit or tgi_bitblt personally.

That was my original thought too but looking at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bit_blit that seems to be more than - at
least I think - we're planning here...

> I agree we should avoid the
> term "sprite", as that means different things on different platforms
> (although some platforms may just use their sprite hardware to implement
> tgi_blit-the lynx probably.)

I think the type of sprites I know are too different to allow for
that. A user of the function in question has the right to presume i.e.
these working:

- Call it as many times with as many bitmaps he likes.
- Draw i.e. a line over a bitmap.
- Get the color of a drawn bitmap pixel with tgi_getpixel().
- Save a screen with drawn bitmaps using some-non TGI function as a
target-specific graphics file.

Regards,
Oliver
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Nov 9 11:08:34 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-11-09 11:08:38 CET