> Because in many cases, the compiler detects that the second write is useless > (because the first one did the job already) and removes it. The standard > workaround in C is to use "volatile", but cc65 doesn't honour this keyword. Ah, I understand. I thought Groepaz was talking about cc65 specifically. -- Brad Smith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Oct 18 00:36:50 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-10-18 00:36:53 CEST