On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:55:46AM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > > But it would create quite massive > > sized programs if every compiled C program on C64 also includes the support > > code for these ... > > In contrast to the open() enhancments discussed in "the other thread" > we're talking here about additional functions which if not used by a > program won't increase it by a single byte. > > > It would be better to write a minimalistic (mono tasking > > is enough) OS to run these programs on top of it, or having some loadable > > module, etc, as not every programs may need such features in detail on an > > average CBM platform, I think. > > The "ordinary" linker is fully capable of handling this by just not > including the library code in question. Ok, possibly I wanted to handle the two threads together too much. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Aug 16 11:33:45 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-08-16 11:33:48 CEST